|
Homework
This version was saved 1 year, 2 months ago
View current version Page history
Saved by Chris Werry
on January 12, 2024 at 4:12:52 pm
Before First Class or in First Class
- Read the syllabus and take a look at the course wiki. Note any questions you have and be prepared to share them in class.
- Share some information about yourself on this google slide (you will need to use your SDSU google ID to access it). If you feel
comfortable, include a photo.
- Go to the Canvas Discussion Board and click on the "Introduce Yourself" thread. Create a post saying a bit about yourself and your
interests, and some initial thoughts on our first course topic, writing and generative A.I.
Tue 01/23
-
Read pages 3-4, 6-18 of of RWEA (Reading, Writing, and Evaluating Argument). Review the major elements of argument, then read Snape. Describe the overall argument, a claim, a piece of evidence, an appeal to pathos, a rebuttal, and a qualifier. Then do the same for Kristof.
-
What are the main differences between Snape and Kristof's argument? For example, how are Kristof's rebuttals different from Snapes?
-
Do a critical reading of Bryce, “Wind is Not the Answer,” and Abdul Jabbar, “It's Time to Pay College Athletes.” Note any shortcomings, flaws, or weaknesses or you can find.
-
Post to the Discussion Board and your Google folder.
Th 01/25
- It is often said we are entering "the age of A.I." Share some initial thoughts, experiences, insights, hopes, or fears. What might this
mean for you, your area of study, your (future) profession, the world? What have your initial encounters with A.I. been like?
- Read Mollick, “Signs and Portents.” Mollick is one of the most influential scholars writing about A.I. In this text he outlines major
impacts A.I. has had, and he predicts future impacts in the year ahead. What are his main claims? What did you find most interesting or useful about his argument? Was there anything you would like to learn more about?
- Caplan's,“Dear Student: Keep Away From ChatGPT” provides a concise account of common arguments warning students to be cautious
when using A.I.. What are his main claims? What did you find most interesting or useful ? Were there any points you would challenge or endorse?
- Respond to two classmates' posts.
Tu 01/30
- Read Mollick, “Programming in Prose,” and Matthews, “If You’re Not Using ChatGPT for your Writing You’re Making a Mistake.”
- What are Mollick's main claims in “Programming in Prose”? What kind of education does he suggest will be needed to make
the best use of of A.I.? What was most interesting or useful about his argument?
- What are Matthews main claims in “If You’re Not Using ChatGPT for your Writing You’re Making a Mistake”? What did you find
most interesting/useful about his argument?Were you persuaded that writers should embrace ChatGPT?
- Respond to two classmates' posts.
- If you are in a group presenting on one of the "optimistic" perspectives on A.I., post a link to your presentation here.
Th 02/01
- If you are in a group presenting on one of the "critical" perspectives on A.I., finish working on your presentation and post
a link to your presentation here.
Tu 02/06
- Read the prompt for assignment 1, Harari et al., “You Can Have the Blue Pill or the Red Pill,” and review the VOX video,
“AI Can do your Homework. Now What?” Summarize Harari et al's main claims and evidence, and examine a persuasive strategy. What do you notice about the way Harari tries to impact his audience? Describe a strength and/or weakness.
- What were the main things you learned from watching “AI Can do your Homework"? Describe a persuasive strategy, and a strength
and/or weakness.
- Brainstorm ideas for part 2 of the assignment. Share your initial thoughts.
- Respond to two classmates' posts.
Th 02/08
- Write a full draft for paper 1 in Google Docs (not pdf or Word or any other format) and put this in your class Google folder.
Post a link to your Google doc here (make sure you set sharing so I have permission to see and edit).
- Share a brief account of what you plan to do for part 2 of the paper on this discussion board. If students seem interested in similar
projects there will be opportunities to collaborate later on in the class.
Th 02/15
- Install the Hypothes.is browser extension on the web browser you use on your laptop. Sign up for a Hypothes.is (it's free).
- Bring your laptop to class.
Tu 02/20
- Read Thompson's, “Public Thinking.” Use the Hypothes.is web extension to make notes on the text - share
any thoughts, questions, or observations you have.
- Discuss Thompson's central claims, and the evidence he uses to support them. What is distinctive about the way he
organizes his claims? Which parts of his argument do you find most interesting and/or useful?
- His text is an excerpt from a 2012 book intended for a popular audience. How does this context shape his argument?
Where do you see him tailoring his argument for a popular audience?
- Thomson is writing in 2012. How well has his argument aged? If we were to update his argument for the
current context, what aspects of the current digital landscape might we look to?
1) In Wallace’s speech he establishes ingroups and
(Students with surnames A-L should do this for “Do We Have the Courage to Stop This?” and students with surnames
M-Z should do this for "Some Inconvenient Gun Facts for Liberals.”)
outgroups. List all the types of people he places in the outgroup and what qualities (adjectives) and values they are assigned.
2) List the types of people who are part of the ingroup and the qualities and values they are assigned.
3) What seems to be the two choices with which he presents his audience? How does he characterize these two choices?
4) How does Wallace create a sense of insecurity in his audience? What outside threats does he present them with?
What other aspects of demagoguery (as defined by Roberts-Miller) can you see in Wallace’s speech (victimization, demonization, anti-intellectualism, motivism, fallacies, etc.)
1.Identify two or more places in LaPierre where there is evidence of the element of demagoguery (try to find the best examples) Give examples (use quotations) and explain how/to what extent the examples fit RM’s definition. Make a case for your interpretation (be like a lawyer – this is key). It may be that the examples only fit RM’s definition to some degree. Explain this.
Homework
|
Tip: To turn text into a link, highlight the text, then click on a page or file from the list above.
|
|
|
|
|
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.